News Archive
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

House panel asks DA to explain absence of rice safeguard action

PHILSTAR FILE PHOTO

A HOUSE of Representatives special committee has asked the Department of Agriculture (DA) to explain why it has not pursued safeguard action for rice.

In a letter addressed to Agriculture Secretary Francisco P. Tiu Laurel, Jr., Special Committee on Globalization Vice Chairman Ryan S. Recto said farmer raised concerns about the uneven application of special safeguards.

“It was noted that while the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) has been proactive in exercising its mandate to protect non-agricultural industries through provisional and definitive safeguards, a similar level of protection has not been extended to local agricultural producers,” Mr. Recto said in the letter, a copy of which was obtained by BusinessWorld.

Special safeguard measures allow the government to temporarily raise duties on specific imported products when their prices or volumes breach certain trigger levels, in order to protect domestic industries from cheap imports.

Under Republic Act No. 8800 or the Safeguard Measures Act, the DA may request the Bureau of Customs to impose an additional duty on the product under review equivalent to not more than a third of its current duty.

In his letter, Mr. Recto asked the DA to explain why it has not resorted to safeguard measures for rice and other “sensitive” products.

The committee also sought more details on the administrative or technical constraints preventing the DA from prioritizing domestic production even though agricultural products are exempt from the “public interest” test under Section 5 of RA 8800.

The Committee said the DA’s response would help legislators fine-tune proposed amendments to the Safeguard Measures Act.

Leonardo Q. Montemayor, former Agriculture secretary and chairman of the Federation of Free Farmers, said it has been nearly five months since the group and MAGSASAKA Party-List petitioned the DA to initiate safeguard measures.

“Almost five months have elapsed since we petitioned Secretary Laurel to apply safeguard measures to protect rice farmers against the serious injury caused by the surge in rice imports in 2025,” he said in a Facebook message. “Until now, the good Secretary has not even started the investigation.”

The DA was asked via Viber to comment but had not replied at the deadline. — Vonn Andrei E. Villamiel

https://www.bworldonline.com/economy/2026/02/15/730687/house-panel-asks-da-to-explain-absence-of-rice-safeguard-action/ QR Code

Published Date: February 15, 2026

More News

Unlock Full Access to Rice Market Updates


We sincerely thank all our valued members who have subscribed to our services and continue to support our platform. Your trust motivates us to keep delivering timely and reliable insights on the global rice industry.

 

For those who have not yet subscribed, we warmly invite you to join our growing community. Subscribe today to continue exploring the platform and stay updated with the latest developments, market movements, and key events shaping the rice business worldwide.

 

Team@ricenewstoday.com

This will close in 0 seconds